10 Critical Questions for Hospital CIOs on CMS’s E-Notifications CoP

Bamboo Health recently hosted a webinar for hospital executives and providers on the new e-notifications Condition of Participation (CoP) requirement that the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) published on May 1, 2020, in the Federal Register.

Under the new CoP, hospitals, psychiatric hospitals, and Critical Access Hospitals must send real-time ADT-based e-notifications to patients’ established practitioners, practice groups and entities, and post-acute providers and suppliers.

Both during and after the webinar, our team received several important questions from hospital CIOs and heads of compliance about the specific requirement details, and what it will take for them to achieve compliance by the May 1, 2021 deadline. Below are ten critical questions answered by our team to help support hospital executive teams as they navigate this new requirement.

1. HOW IS “REAL-TIME” FOR SENDING NOTIFICATIONS DEFINED IN THE FINAL CMS? IS THERE A SPECIFIC TIMEFRAME (E.G. 24 HOURS) THAT CMS SPECIFIES?

Hospitals are required to send e-notifications at the time of a patient’s inpatient admission, discharge, and transfer event and at emergency department presentation/registration and discharge. CMS was deliberate in requiring e-notifications be sent in real time, i.e. “at the time of” an event occurring.  Real-time delivery of the e-notification not only eliminates information delays and improves current information sharing practices, but also guarantees the information is actionable, which maximizes care coordination opportunities across the care continuum and improves patient outcomes. An e-notification delay lasting hours or days or sending batched e-notifications will not meet the rule requirements to send notifications “at the time of” events occurring.

2. IS THERE A LIMIT ON THE NUMBER OF PROVIDERS A PATIENT CAN HAVE THEIR DISCHARGE INFORMATION SENT TO BY THE HOSPITAL?

The only limitation is that notifications need to be sent to practitioners, practice groups or entities, and applicable post-acute care providers and suppliers that have an established care relationship with the patient and that need the information for treatment, care coordination, or quality improvement activities. Therefore, the number of e-notification recipients will vary by the number of providers a patient has and there is no prescribed limit. Of course, a patient is able to specify their data sharing preferences and hospitals or their intermediaries must send e-notifications in a manner that is consistent with those privacy preferences and with all applicable federal and state laws and regulations.

3. WILL HOSPITALS THAT ALREADY SEND THEIR ADT FEEDS TO HIES BE AUTOMATICALLY COMPLIANT WITH THE COP?

Compliance will depend on whether the HIE, as the hospital’s intermediary, can fulfill the minimum requirements specified within the final rule. Those requirements include the ability to send e-notifications:

  • For all required patient events – inpatient admissions, discharges and transfer events as well as for emergency department presentation/registration and discharge events
  • In real time – at the time of admission, presentation/registration, discharge, and transfer
  • Including, at minimum, patient name, treating practitioner name, and sending institution name
  • To the practitioners, practice groups or entities, and post-acute providers and suppliers identified directly by patients and that are not otherwise fulfilled through a hospital’s existing technology solution
  • To the established primary care practitioners, established primary care practice groups or entities, and applicable post-acute providers and suppliers that have an active care relationship with the patient and request information for treatment care coordination, or quality improvement activities irrespective of geographic location
  • Consistent with patients’ privacy preferences – no e-notifications must be sent for patients that do not want their information to be shared
  • To recipients that have required data sharing agreements in place and consistent with all applicable federal and state laws and regulations.

In addition, to minimize any potential security incidents and inaccurate notifications, a high accuracy match rate should be in place to ensure notifications are sent to the appropriate providers.  Any intermediary, including HIEs, should have capabilities to frequently update provider-patient care relationships given they often change, especially in the post-acute setting.

Ultimately, hospitals are accountable to meet compliance requirements even when they delegate the e-notification functions to HIEs or other intermediaries and should therefore ensure that all minimum requirements are met.

4. WHAT IS THE PENALTY FOR NON-COMPLIANCE WITH THE NEW COP REQUIREMENT?

Conditions of Participation are the most significant and consequential regulatory lever that CMS has to authorize or terminate a hospital’s certification. CMS certification determines whether hospitals can receive Medicare and Medicaid payments, which often make up more than 50% of a hospital’s payer mix. To receive or maintain certification, hospitals must meet all CoPs, making compliance with CoP standards and conditions essential to hospital operations.

If deficiencies in complying with the e-notification CoP are found during the survey process, those deficiencies will be formally documented by the survey team on the CMS “Statement of Deficiencies and Plan of Correction” form and hospitals must follow time-bound processes to correct them. Unless hospitals remediate deficiencies, termination of CMS certification will go into effect after a maximum of 90 days.

5. HOW WOULD POST-ACUTES OR PCPS RESPOND TO A NOTIFICATION? CAN THEY SEND A REPLY TO THE HOSPITAL SYSTEM?

There is no prescribed way or method for post-acutes or PCPs to respond to e-notifications they receive from hospitals. CMS also does not require a “read receipt” from e-notification recipients.  However, the goals of the CoP are for recipients to use the information to support their care coordination efforts, enhance communication across the care continuum and thereby improve patient outcomes.  CMS hopes to support providers through added access to important information about their patients so these goals can be realized.

6. WILL ADDITIONAL INFORMATION BE PUBLISHED BY CMS THAT SPECIFY FORMAT OR OTHER DETAILS ABOUT THE RULE?

There will not be any foreseeable modification to the CMS Interoperability and Patient Access Final Rule given it has already been finalized and published in the Federal Register. However, the CMS Center for Clinical Standards and Quality will publish interpretive guidelines for the e-notification CoP that will give additional information and instructions to the survey teams as they prepare to assess hospital compliance.

7. WOULD PROVIDERS SUCH AS SNFS THAT RECEIVE E-NOTIFICATION FROM HOSPITALS ALSO NEED TO BE RESPONSIBLE TO SEND E-NOTIFICATION TO HOME HEALTH AGENCIES AND HOSPICES?

This e-notification CoP only applies to hospitals, psychiatric hospitals, and Critical Access Hospitals and does not include e-notification provisions or requirements for other types of providers.  There are currently no CMS requirements in place that would require SNFs to send e-notifications to other post-acute providers or care settings.

8. ADT FEEDS CAN GO DOWN FROM TIME TO TIME. WHAT IS THE ALLOWABLE RECOVERY PROCESS AND TIME THAT AVOIDS PENALTIES?

Any downtime should be minimized but in cases where downtime does occur, it should be documented and resolved as quickly as possible.  For audit purposes, it will be beneficial to document information about downtimes so that any e-notification lapses can be justified and explained.  Hospitals or intermediaries should always address the root causes of any downtime to ensure that there are no systematic gaps in information sharing introduced and/or perpetuated.

9. DO HOSPITALS HAVE TO HAVE A SPECIFIC EHR FOR THIS COP?

Hospitals are not required to have a specific EHR under the e-notification CoP.  In fact, hospitals included as part of the e-notification CoP can have any EHR or other electronic administrative system that is conformant with the HL7 2.5.1 content exchange standard.

10. WHAT ABOUT NOTIFYING THE PATIENT’S INSURANCE CARRIER?

Under the minimum CoP requirements outlined in the final rule, hospitals have to send notifications only to the patient’s established primary care practitioner, practice group or entity; the practitioner, practice group or entity identified by the patient as primarily providing his or her care; and applicable post-acute providers and suppliers. Insurance carriers are not included in this minimum set of recipients. However, CMS states in the final rule that the CoP requirements only represent a minimum floor and do not prohibit the sharing of information with additional parties for treatment, care coordination, or quality improvement activities as long as required data sharing agreements are in place and all state and federal laws and regulations are followed.

What Can You Do To Be Ready?

To assess compliance readiness and required solution functionality, we strongly encourage hospital CIOs, compliance executives, and others responsible for ensuring CoP compliance to review the Key Considerations and the Compliance Checklist. These resources can help executive teams learn more about the CoP requirements and help them navigate their path to compliance.

For hospitals that will use third-party intermediaries to meet the e-notification compliance requirements, Bamboo Health’s Route solution offers a compliance guarantee and meets all the published requirements.  Visit our Route page to learn more.

Why E-Notifications Matter More than Ever

Amidst the COVID-19 crisis, sharing real-time information about patients’ care encounters across providers and settings matters more than ever. In particular, hospitals sharing admission, discharge, and transfer (ADT) events with COVID-19 patients’ community-based providers is critical to ensure better, safer, and faster treatment and care transitions for infected and recovering patients.

ADT events, when shared as notifications, enable these improved care transitions because they include relevant information about a patient’s current care encounter, basic demographic details, diagnoses where permissible and available, and information about the provider or institution sending the notification. Even before the current pandemic, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) recognized the importance of such ADT notifications in supporting patient care and finalized a new Condition of Participation (CoP) as part of the Interoperability and Patient Access Rule (CMS-9115-F).  The CoP requires hospitals to share electronic ADT event notifications, or e-notifications, with other community providers, such as primary care physicians (PCPs) and post-acute care providers, to facilitate better care coordination and improve patient outcomes.

The necessity and benefit of these e-notifications has come into stark relief as providers and the healthcare system more broadly fight COVID-19. ADT-based e-notifications are an accessible and easy way to help enable better safety for COVID-19 patients and their providers while also ensuring efficient use and appropriate allocation of scarce resources.  We are outlining five such use cases below.

1. Safety for Patients

Protecting patient safety and providing appropriate treatment is especially urgent during a crisis like COVID-19 when resources are limited and staff are stretched.  E-notifications allow hospitals that treat COVID-19 patients to more rapidly get in touch with a patient’s other providers and obtain important medical histories to help guide treatment and clinical decision-making.  Traditional exchange of data facilitated by phone calls, faxes, or labor intensive data searches can introduce treatment delays, unnecessary or harmful interventions, and frustrations for providers. The faster information can be exchanged and a patient’s history is known by the hospital care team, the easier it is to effectively and safely treat the patient with the most appropriate interventions.

2. Safety for Providers

Hospital e-notifications are especially important for post-acute and other community-based providers that will continue treatment for COVID-19 patients discharged from the hospital because they provide context about the patient’s most recent encounter, including diagnoses where available and permissible, to help guide the continuation of care. The ability to share and receive information from hospital ADTs allows those providers to appropriately prepare staff and put safety measures in place prior to receiving COVID-19 patients. In particular, Skilled Nursing Facilities need time to properly and safely intake infected patients while Home Health Agencies need to prepare and equip their nurses for visits to homes of infected patients.

3. Open Hospital Beds for the Sickest Patients

Through real-time e-notifications, hospitals are able to more easily and quickly communicate and share information with COVID-19 patients’ other community-based providers who will care for recovering patients after they are discharged from the hospital. This exchange of information allows hospital care teams to more seamlessly and quickly transition recovering COVID-19 patients to the next level of care, which opens scarce hospital beds for the sickest patients.

4. Better Care for COVID-19 Patients

Real time e-notifications from hospitals allow PCPs and care coordinators to know when their patients have inpatient or ED events. In particular, discharge notifications can trigger critical follow-up services, including telehealth, to ensure COVID-19 patients recover safely and fully after they leave the hospital. Engaging COVID-19 patients after a hospitalization can help prevent readmissions and keep healthy in their home.  At the same time, PCPs are able to support the financial viability of their practices by being able to provide and bill for Transitional Care Management Services and ensure patient engagement in ongoing preventive and other clinical care.

5. Improved Public Health Response

ADT-based notifications offer wide-ranging and powerful real-time data for local, state, and federal public health officials to detect emerging COVID-19 hotspots and intense ED, hospital, ICU strain. With de-identified data to ensure patients’ health information is protected in accordance with HIPAA, notifications about hospital and ED utilization can help public health officials direct and allocate scarce resources to the highest need areas quickly.

These are just some examples of how patient care can be better managed when providers and care teams are connected during clinical encounters for the benefit of patients.  We are seeing care teams come together daily in transformative ways by leveraging ADT e-notifications, especially during these trying times.

For more information on CMS’s new e-notification requirements, visit www.adtnotifications.com.

Partnering with NextLevel Health

We sat down with Tina Zurita, Director of Quality Management at NextLevel Health, a Medicaid Managed Care Organization (MCO) serving Medicaid beneficiaries and members participating in the Managed Long-Term Services and Supports program. Tina shares how her team uses Bamboo Health (formerly Appriss Health and PatientPing) solutions to improve care collaboration efforts and member outcomes.

Thanks so much, Tina!

See how partnering with Bamboo Health can enhance the care your team delivers to patients. Contact us to learn more.

Four Questions Series: Shelly Kent, Care Manager, Perrysburg Family Physicians

For our latest Four Questions Series, we sat down with Shelly Kent, care manager at Perrysburg Family Physicians, LLC., an independent family practice located in Perrysburg, Ohio. Perrysburg has five affiliated physicians within its practice who provide care to over 6,600 patients. As a participant in Track 2 of CMS’ CPC+ model, Perrysburg Family Physicians is focused on improving care outcomes for patients while reducing overall care costs.

PatientPing became Bamboo Health in 2021.

Continue reading “Four Questions Series: Shelly Kent, Care Manager, Perrysburg Family Physicians”

Four Questions Series: Shannon Parrish, Director of Care Coordination, CHESS

For our latest Four Questions Series, we sat down with Shannon Parrish, Director of Care Coordination at CHESS, a NextGen ACO located in High Point, North Carolina. CHESS is a physician-led healthcare service organization that is supporting its participating physicians and health systems to provide improved, value-based care to the patients they serve. As a NextGen ACO, CHESS is focused on identifying key areas of care that result in high costs and wasted resources.

Continue reading “Four Questions Series: Shannon Parrish, Director of Care Coordination, CHESS”

Four Questions Series: Erik Iverson, VP of Business Development, Legacy Healthcare

For our latest Four Questions Series, we sat down with Erik Iverson, VP of Business Development at Legacy Healthcare located in Skokie, Illinois. Legacy Healthcare provides skilled nursing, rehabilitation, and specialized services to patients across 32 facilities throughout the Chicagoland area, as well as in Utah and Montana. Legacy aims to provide personal, empathetic, and customized care to each of the patients they serve.

What are some of the care coordination challenges your organization has faced?

One of the biggest care coordination challenges that we have faced at Legacy is knowing what a patient’s’ care journey looks like prior to them entering our doors. We often receive information on a patient’s most recent event, but we’re missing the important information about what happened to them before that. If an 80-year-old woman comes to receive care at one of our facilities after a hospital visit, we may know what happened to her at the hospital, but what about the 80 years before that? Without this information, we’re in the dark on patients’ medical histories, who their care providers are, whether or not they see specialists, etc. We then have to piece information together to develop an effective care plan.

Another challenge has been monitoring our patients post-discharge. It’s been difficult to ensure that patients are following up with their PCPs and continuing the services they need in order to stay healthy. Additionally, patients don’t always know that they can come back to our facilities to receive care and turn to the ED instead which results in costly, unnecessary readmissions.

How have you overcome these challenges?

Technology has been a big part of overcoming these challenges. Without it, it’s difficult for our staff to stay on top of care events, and information can easily fall through the cracks. Technology like PatientPing (Pings) helps us by enabling our staff to act on patient events faster.

With PatientPing (Pings), we’re able to see the patient’s journey prior to them admitting to one of our facilities. PatientPing (Pings) also gives us the patient’s care team contact information, enabling collaboration with other providers on appropriate care plans. This has not only helped ensure that we’re providing the right services, but it’s also helped us build relationships with our surrounding hospitals and health systems. As a SNF, if our readmission rates are too high, we may be not considered for certain partnerships. Having information at our fingertips through PatientPing (Pings) has helped us maintain certain benchmarks, perform better, stay ahead of our competition and provide better care to our patients.

Through PatientPing (Pings), we’re also able to monitor patients post-discharge. We are notified as soon as patients present to an ED, allowing us to intervene and direct patients back to our facilities when appropriate. Not only does this avoid unnecessary ED visits, but allows us to provide continued support to the patients we serve.

How has Pings helped you achieve your goals?

With a lot of technology today, it may look exciting, but it may also force us to do things outside of our day-to-day. The beauty of PatientPing (Pings) is that it’s been easy to integrate into our existing workflows.

Before PatientPing (Pings), figuring out who a patient’s PCP was or determining whether they had seen a specialist was both tedious and time-consuming. Now, we’re able to see this info days before the patient is admitted to our facilities, putting us ahead of the game. We’re able to plan ahead for LOS expectations and post-discharge follow-ups, making the patient’s stay much smoother.

We’ve also strengthened our relationship with hospitals. Because we’re notified when a patient presents to the ED post-discharge, we are able to inform them that the patient doesn’t necessarily need to be admitted and can come back to receive care at our facility.

Overall, PatientPing (Pings) benefits everyone involved. Providers always want to do what is best for the patient, but when the information they need isn’t readily available, that can be hard to do. With PatientPing (Pings), all of the information is there and now we’re able to focus less on worrying about these logistics and more on improving care for patients.

Can you tell us about a time when Pings helped you help a patient?

When we receive Pings on our discharged patients who present to the ED, we often perform what we call “wellness checks”, where we send someone from our facility to drive to the ED and check in on the patient.

In one instance, we sent a liaison to a nearby hospital to check on a patient who had been sitting in the ED for over 6 hours with her husband. The liaison learned that the patient did not feel well and wasn’t operating well at home. The liaison then informed the patient that she was able to come back to our facility to receive care for no additional cost. We were able to set her up with transportation back to our facility where she received rehab services for a week in the comfort of our SNF.

In this case, the patient was unaware of her care options and went to the ED to receive support. With PatientPing (Pings), we were able to avoid costly, unnecessary hospital admissions and also provide continuous support to the patient and her family.

Four Questions Series: Tim Carey, Director of Data and Performance Analytics, BaneCare Management

For our latest Four Questions Series, we sat down with Tim Carey, director of data and performance analytics at BaneCare Management. BaneCare Management operates 12 skilled nursing facilities throughout Massachusetts, and is a trusted family-owned senior services company that has been a leading provider of rehabilitation, skilled nursing, assisted living and adult day health for nearly six decades. BaneCare is driven to creating an environment built on compassion, dignity, and respect for residents and their extended families, as well as for its community and staff members.

Can you tell us about some of the care coordination challenges your organization has faced in the last few years?

In my world of data and analytics, some of the care coordination challenges that we face are around data integrity. At BaneCare, we work extremely hard to provide accurate data. When we meet with organizations that we work with, there are times where our data on patients’ care events doesn’t match up. For example, we recently met with a hospital and an ACO who both monitor patient events in EHRs. The hospital and ACO saw that one patient was documented as being discharged home with VNA services when that same patient was actually receiving care at one of our facilities. This fragmented data for the hospital and ACO creates various challenges, especially for the clinical staff who are responsible for following patients during their care journeys.

How have you overcome these challenges?

At BaneCare, we are continuously stressing the importance of communication and leveraging PatientPing (Pings) to accurately monitor where patients are going. With PatientPing (Pings),  we can see in real time whenever and wherever patients go to receive care. This has helped us strengthen relationships with other organizations in the community because we can collaborate more closely to reduce readmissions and help get patients to the right care settings at the right time.

What insights do you have now that you lacked prior to implementing Pings?

With PatientPing (Pings), we’re able to see the “big picture” and follow patients as they move from care setting to care setting. Prior to PatientPing (Pings), this was complicated for us. I remember a time a few years ago when I was a business analyst at a local community hospital. I needed to find information on SNF readmission rates, but in order to do so, I had to go through a very long and time consuming process. Now, fast forward a few years, and we have PatientPing (Pings) to provide this information and pull these analytics for us.

PatientPing (Pings)’s reporting also continues to improve, and helps us to standardize our required monthly reporting by telling us admission activity, ALOS and 30-day readmission rates. This helps us to standardize and automate the reporting process between organizations across the continuum.

How has Pings helped you improve patient care?

We use PatientPing (Pings) for process improvement efforts, specifically to monitor patients presenting to a hospital after they’ve been discharged from a SNF. It’s important for us to determine reasons for admissions so that we can improve our discharge planning processes and care for patients in return. At BaneCare, it’s all about continuous improvement, so we are always using data–like the data we receive from PatientPing (Pings) –to help drive those efforts.

For example, our facilities receive notifications from PatientPing (Pings) as soon as a patient presents to a hospital. From there, we’re able to work with that hospital in real time, and direct patients back to SNFs when appropriate. This collaboration helps to not only reduce unnecessary readmissions, but also improves the care provided to patients by getting them to the right care setting at the right time.

Learn how Pings can help your organization coordinate care.  Contact us today.